Products Registered for Use on Crops

Navigation menu

Wherever You Sail
Fungicide, Foliar spray, for the control of coffee berry disease in coffee and control of coffee leaf rust as a tank mix with Cobox. Archived from the original on 23 April Archived from the original on 30 July Insecticide for control of aphids and white flies in Runner beans; flower thrips and aphids in Snow peas; aphids, whiteflies and thrips in French beans; aphids in Mangetout and aphids in Roses. The New York Times.

Marine Lubricants Equivalent Table

Available Safety Data Sheets

For instance, damages in trespass cases involving assault, battery and false imprisonment commonly include a component for injury to feelings or mental distress caused by the tort, as do cases of malicious prosecution and defamation.

Nor may they experience an injury that is either physical or amounting to a psychological disorder. It is the emotional damage or loss to their dignity and the hurt and loss of trust caused by the privacy breach that is their greatest concern and one that in our view often necessitates an award of damages to compensate for this loss.

An award limited to compensating material loss will therefore often be insufficient to counteract the wrong. Effective redress requires that the plaintiff can also claim compensation for intangible losses, such as injury to feelings. Courts will be likely to look at damages awarded in comparable cases for other torts. What can be achieved by a monetary award in the circumstances is limited. Any award must be proportionate and avoid the appearance of arbitrariness. Analysis of the cases Recommendation 12—2 The Act should set out the following non-exhaustive list of factors that a court may consider when determining the amount of damages:.

This is a non-exhaustive list. It is intended to guide a court when determining the assessment of damages. It will be for the court to decide whether particular factors are relevant. For instance, s 38 of the Defamation Act NSW sets out mitigating factors for a court to consider when assessing damages, including whether the defendant has made an apology to the plaintiff or has published a correction of the defamatory matter.

While there was no separate award of aggravated damages in Mosley for instance, aggravating conduct was relevant to the assessment of the award of general damages. As Lord Reid said, in the context of defamation, in Cassell v Broome:. He may have behaved in a highhanded, malicious, insulting or oppressive manner in committing the tort or he or his counsel may at the trial have aggravated the injury by what they there said.

Where a plaintiff has pursued alternative dispute resolution ADR or some other complaints mechanism prior to undertaking legal proceedings under the new privacy tort, a court should consider any compensation or other remedy obtained when assessing damages. These may result in the payment of compensation or an award of damages. Advocates for persons experiencing domestic violence were concerned by the inclusion of this factor in the list of mitigating and aggravating factors.

The ALRC also agrees that failure by a plaintiff to engage with a defendant who shows a willingness to settle a dispute prior to legal proceedings should only be used against a plaintiff in an award of damages, where it would be reasonable to do so in the circumstances. Under state apportionment legislation, a court may reduce an award of damages in certain claims to the extent that the plaintiff was at fault, [59] but only where the defence of contributory negligence would have been a complete defence at common law.

Contributory negligence is not a defence at common law to intentional torts and the apportionment legislation therefore does not apply to such claims. However, as Eady J pointed out in Mosley,. On the other hand, the extent to which his own conduct has contributed to the nature and scale of the distress might be a relevant factor on causation.

Has he, for example, put himself in a predicament by his own choice which contributed to his distress and loss of dignity? However, it will be a matter for the court whether this should be considered in a particular case. Recommendation 12—3 The Act should provide that the court may not award a separate sum as aggravated damages.

The NSWLRC explained that aggravating circumstances would already form some part of an assessment for general damages, stating:.

Recommendation 12—4 The Act should provide that a court may award exemplary damages in exceptional circumstances. The deterrent function of exemplary damages is arguably more valuable than the punitive function.

The aim of awarding exemplary damages to deter similar conduct by others in the future has been recognised by Australian courts. In the UK, the Leveson Inquiry recommended that courts be able to award exemplary or punitive damages for actions in breach of confidence, defamation and the tort of misuse of personal information.

PIAC also supports the award of exemplary damages where other damages awarded would be an insufficient deterrent. Recommendation 12—5 The Act should provide for a cap on damages. The cap should apply to the sum of both damages for non-economic loss and any exemplary damages.

This cap should not exceed the cap on damages for non-economic loss in defamation. Any award for exemplary damages should be included in the amount of damages subject to this cap.

The total amount of general damages for non-economic loss and exemplary damages awarded should be capped at the same amount as the cap on damages for non-economic loss in defamation awards. However, if a cap were to be introduced, they supported an alignment with defamation law. A cap similar to that applied in defamation cases for non-economic loss would seem appropriate.

Courts are equipped to assess appropriate awards of damages based on the context in which each case arises. Capital Ownership as of December 31, [30]. AXA headquarters is located in the 8th arrondissement of Paris. Architect Ricardo Bofill integrated the facade of the hotel with a modern glass building that covers the courtyard that the hotel also occupies. The complex serves as AXA's head office. AXA also gathers every year the young fellows to meet a world-class researcher, exchange best practices and network.

These Research and Education Chairs intend to attract the best scientists. For example, the AXA - Polytechnique Chair in Cellular Cardiovascular Engineering, [35] held by Abdul Barakat, aims to promote research on cardiovascular diseases, but also to train and develop young researchers through extended educational programs.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. For other uses, see Axa disambiguation. For the baseball team, see New York Mutuals. This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. April Learn how and when to remove this template message. Paris portal Companies portal. Retrieved July 4, Stock market quotes, charts and news". Archived from the original on Archived from the original PDF on Glattfelder; Stefano Battiston October 26, Archived from the original on August 6, Archived from the original on 16 August Archived from the original on 30 July Archived from the original on 20 November Axa Buys Stake in U.

The New York Times. Archived from the original on 1 October Retrieved 27 September Archived from the original on July 9, Retrieved July 7, Le Journal du Net. Retrieved on 7 July Euro Stoxx 50 companies of the Euro Area.

CAC 40 companies of France as of 4 October

Where can I buy? Buy at any of our more than 15 000 stores.